District of Columbia firearm-rights law is its own layer of the analysis. D.C. law imposes firearm disabilities for specified violent, sex, weapons, drug, and threat-related offenses. Some disabilities are time-limited, while more serious categories generally require pardon-based relief.
The federal § 925(c) program is active again.
DOJ finalized its Federal Firearm Rights Restoration rule on August 17, 2026 and is administering applications through the Office of the Pardon Attorney. DOJ announced that the first 5,000 public applicants may apply beginning November 4, 2026. A federal grant removes only the federal disability covered by that relief; independent state restrictions still require separate analysis.
How gun-rights restoration works in District of Columbia
The route depends on the offense category; pardon is especially important for permanent restrictions. A responsible review should start with the exact statute of conviction, the sentence that was imposed, when every sentence requirement ended, and any later criminal history.
District of Columbia law and the federal § 925(c) process
The federal process under 18 U.S.C. § 925(c) can address a federal firearm prohibition, but the effect of federal relief under District of Columbia law is jurisdiction-specific. A person can therefore have a federal question, a state question, or both. Both layers should be resolved before any firearm is possessed, purchased, received, transported, or handled.
A federal § 925(c) grant does not by itself establish that every District of Columbia firearm restriction has been removed. State law and any independent state disability must be checked separately.
State-law reference point
A commonly cited District of Columbia provision in this area is D.C. Code § 7-2502.03. Statutes, cases, definitions, and restoration procedures change, so the current official law and the applicant’s complete record should be checked before relying on a general summary.
What can change the answer?
A pardon, civil-rights restoration, judicial firearm order, passage of a statutory waiting period, federal § 925(c) relief where state law recognizes it, or another qualifying firearm-rights order may alter the analysis depending on District of Columbia law. The legal effect of the actual signed order matters more than the label someone uses for it.
What to bring to a District of Columbia rights-restoration review
- Charging document and final judgment or disposition
- Sentencing order and proof of sentence completion
- Current state and federal criminal-history records
- Any pardon, expungement, set-aside, civil-rights restoration, federal restoration, or prior firearm-rights order
- Current state of residence and prior states of residence