Why a Assault With Intent to Murder conviction matters
Assault With Intent to Murder cases commonly involve intentional violent conduct, substantial risk of death, or an agreement or attempt to bring about lethal harm. Even when the conviction stops short of a completed homicide, DOJ can evaluate the real-world facts, weapons use, injuries, and surrounding conduct.
How DOJ’s current restoration rule may treat the offense
Expect the current DOJ framework to treat this as a permanent or exceptionally strong presumptive barrier. The sentence-completion date still matters, but it may not overcome the public-safety analysis by itself.
The charging language, plea factual basis, weapon involvement, victim injuries, and any related conspiracy or firearm counts should all be reviewed. A reduced plea label does not necessarily erase violent underlying conduct.
What records should be reviewed?
For a felony-based firearm disability, DOJ currently directs applicants to gather the charging document, judgment of conviction, and official proof of the date the final sentence requirement was completed. Depending on the case, the plea agreement, factual basis, presentence report, prior restoration applications, and state criminal-history records may also be required. See the complete Federal Restoration Required Documents Checklist →
State law can still change the answer
If the assault with intent to murder conviction was entered in state court, a pardon, set-aside, expungement, restoration of civil rights, or firearm-specific order may affect whether the conviction continues to count for federal firearm purposes. The legal effect of the actual order matters. Use the Gun Rights by State guides to identify the separate state layer.
What should you do next?
Start with the Eligibility Review if you are not sure which restoration path fits. If a federal § 925(c) application appears relevant, use the shorter federal restoration services. You can also read the September 2026 DOJ update and the main gun-rights restoration FAQ.
Frequently asked questions
A assault with intent to murder conviction can create a very difficult federal firearm-rights restoration record. DOJ is likely to treat the offense as a permanent or near-permanent barrier absent extraordinary circumstances.
Expect the current DOJ framework to treat this as a permanent or exceptionally strong presumptive barrier. The sentence-completion date still matters, but it may not overcome the public-safety analysis by itself. The exact judgment and underlying conduct should be reviewed before relying on a general category.
Start with the charging document, judgment, plea or trial disposition, sentencing records, official proof of when the final sentence requirement was completed, and copies of any prior pardon or rights-restoration order. DOJ also currently requires state criminal-history records covering the applicable period.
Not necessarily. Probation, parole, supervised release, community service, restitution, fines, or other criminal sentence requirements can affect the final sentence-completion date.
Sometimes, particularly for state convictions, but federal law looks at the legal effect of the relief. A pardon, expungement, set-aside, or restoration of civil rights should be reviewed under 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20) and current state law.
No. Filing an eligibility review, a FelonJustice intake, or an official DOJ application does not suspend a firearm prohibition. Relief must actually be effective under every applicable federal, state, and tribal rule.